Bug 871034
| Summary: | if CN matches hostname/IP but does not match explicitly set host subject, the connection should fail | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | David Jaša <djasa> | |
| Component: | spice-gtk | Assignee: | Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 6.4 | CC: | cfergeau, dblechte, jjongsma, marcandre.lureau, mkrcmari, pvine, rbalakri, tlavigne | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | spice-gtk-0.22-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Cause: For SSL connections, we considered the connection to be successful if the certificate subject matched the hostname even if a user-specified host certificate subject was given that didn't match.
Consequence: Remote-viewer connected to the remote host even if the user-specified certificate subject did not match.
Fix: Make the user-specified certificate subject check have priority over the hostname check.
Result: Connections fail if user-specified cert subject doesn't match.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 873318 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-10-14 06:46:25 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 873318 | |||
|
Description
David Jaša
2012-10-29 13:13:30 UTC
I've sent a potential patch for this to http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2013-September/014612.html . Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1487.html |