Bug 873214

Summary: qemu crash when guest reboot
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Xu Tian <xutian>
Component: qemu-kvmAssignee: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4CC: acathrow, areis, bsarathy, dyasny, mkenneth, virt-maint
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-19 08:31:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
backtrace none

Description Xu Tian 2012-11-05 11:20:31 UTC 
Description of problem:

This bug is very similar to BZ865767, but view from backtrace there different bug, if I'm not right, please feel free to make it as duplicate;


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

releated packages:
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.334
spice-server-0.12.0-2

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. run reboot test case with autotest, you can see please autotest job http://fileshare.englab.nay.redhat.com/pub/logs//58034/default/2416913/debug/
  
Actual results:
qenu crashed 

Expected results:

guest bootup normally

Additional info:
Comment 2 Xu Tian 2012-11-05 11:30:49 UTC 
Created attachment 638502 [details]
backtrace

the core file is very big(65G), if you don't want to downlaod it, please try to mount it to local, nfs path is 10.66.90.128:/vol/S2/kvmauto/fileshare-kvm/xu/bz873214; url is: http://fileshare.englab.nay.redhat.com/pub/section2/kvm/xu/bz873214/
Comment 3 Xu Tian 2012-11-13 02:34:25 UTC 
I'm not sure is this a duplicate bug with BZ865767, if it's really are duplicate, please close as duplicate driectly;
Thanks,
Xu
Comment 5 Gerd Hoffmann 2012-11-14 09:08:16 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm not sure is this a duplicate bug with BZ865767, if it's really are
> duplicate, please close as duplicate driectly;

Not sure either.  Can you test the scratch build from bug 865767?
Comment 6 Xu Tian 2012-11-15 03:29:17 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I'm not sure is this a duplicate bug with BZ865767, if it's really are
> > duplicate, please close as duplicate driectly;
> 
> Not sure either.  Can you test the scratch build from bug 865767?

No problem, but now the package looks has be remove, would you like to help rebuild it, thanks very much;
Comment 9 Gerd Hoffmann 2012-11-19 08:31:01 UTC 
Good, closing as bug 865767 dup then.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 865767 ***