Bug 873850
| Summary: | Cannot create a custom product without explicitly setting a label | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Jeff Weiss <jweiss> |
| Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | Brad Buckingham <bbuckingham> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Og Maciel <omaciel> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.0.1 | CC: | bbuckingham, cpelland, dajohnso, dmacpher, gkhachik, jturner, mmccune, omaciel |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Regression |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
A regression caused validation problems when creating a new product. This fix creates a label from the Product name immediately.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-12-04 19:57:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jeff Weiss
2012-11-06 20:08:19 UTC
Adding "regression" keyword based on comment #0 as well as http://hudson.rhq.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com:8080/hudson/job/cfse-gui/48/testngreports/katello-tests.custom-product-tests/katello-tests.custom-product-tests.custom-product-tests/Create%20a%20custom%20product/ Jay, Mike McCune told me the Regression keyword means "Functionality in the last release is broken in this build", not "Functionality that worked in an unreleased build is broken in this build". I had been using the latter definition, but the way bz works, it seems to follow the former definition, because it marks any bug with Regression keyword as a blocker. According to the former definition this is not a regression, because the label feature didn't exist in the last release. However, I still vote for this to block the release anyway. katello pull request: https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/1010 Verifed both manually and through automation (http://hudson.rhq.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com:8080/hudson/job/cfse-gui/51/testngreports/katello-tests.custom-product-tests/katello-tests.custom-product-tests.custom-product-tests/Create%20a%20custom%20product/) * candlepin-0.7.8.1-1.el6cf.noarch * candlepin-selinux-0.7.8.1-1.el6cf.noarch * candlepin-tomcat6-0.7.8.1-1.el6cf.noarch * katello-1.1.12-21.el6cf.noarch * katello-all-1.1.12-21.el6cf.noarch * katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch * katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch * katello-cli-1.1.8-12.el6cf.noarch * katello-cli-common-1.1.8-12.el6cf.noarch * katello-common-1.1.12-21.el6cf.noarch * katello-configure-1.1.9-12.el6cf.noarch * katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-21.el6cf.noarch * katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-21.el6cf.noarch * katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch * katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch * katello-selinux-1.1.1-2.el6cf.noarch * pulp-1.1.14-1.el6cf.noarch * pulp-common-1.1.14-1.el6cf.noarch * pulp-selinux-server-1.1.14-1.el6cf.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist |