Bug 874701
Summary: | Fedora 16's perl is greater than Fedora 17 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ralf Corsepius <rc040203> |
Component: | perl | Assignee: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 17 | CC: | cweyl, iarnell, jplesnik, kasal, lkundrak, mmaslano, paul, perl-devel, ppisar, psabata, rc040203, tcallawa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | perl-5.14.3-217.fc17 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-11-27 07:56:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ralf Corsepius
2012-11-08 17:05:58 UTC
Should be fixed with the next F-17 updates push to stable: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16429/perl-5.14.3-217.fc17 (In reply to comment #1) > Should be fixed with the next F-17 updates push to stable: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16429/perl-5.14.3-217. > fc17 Well, how could if have happened perl-5.14.2-215 was pushed to F16? (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Should be fixed with the next F-17 updates push to stable: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16429/perl-5.14.3-217. > > fc17 > > Well, how could if have happened perl-5.14.2-215 was pushed to F16? Urgh, cut'n'pasto, of course I meant perl-5.14.3-202 ..., sorry. There was an f17 build, perl-5.14.3-216 submitted at the same time as the f16 build, but that one was obsoleted by perl-5.14.3-217 the following day, which explains why the f16 build popped out of the QA queue a day earlier. Not sure why f17 needed a new build and f16 didn't, or why the f16 build was submitted for stable whilst the f17 build was still going through QA. |