Bug 875605
| Summary: | ramdisk /etc/mke2fs.conf [fstypes] stanza lacks "ext2" tag with inode_size=128 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Franklin (RHlists) <pf.rhlists> |
| Component: | e2fsprogs | Assignee: | Eric Sandeen <esandeen> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 18 | CC: | esandeen, g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, josef, kzak, oliver, sbueno, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-11-13 16:24:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Paul Franklin (RHlists)
2012-11-12 07:35:33 UTC
The /etc/mke2fs.conf file comes from the package. We don't specifically write one out in lorax. Thank you for the response. If the e2fsprogs maintainer doesn't consider it a bug, will one of you tell me how to put my modified /etc/mke2fs.conf file into an updates.img file? It should be possible but I don't know how. Thanks. The default inode size changed from 128 to 256 4 years ago. When you say:
"I have older operating systems which won't mount the new F18
"ext2" filesystem if it is created with an inode_size of
256, which is the default unless a specific filesystem tag
overrides it (as I now do)."
just how old are those operating systems; older than I think 2.6.10?
Anyway, defaults changed upstream 4 years ago:
commit b1631cce648ee87e39b602899d77ad59a81acc66
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso>
Date: Sun Jan 27 19:30:27 2008 -0500
Create new filesystems with 256-byte inodes by default
This makes it easier to upgrade to ext4 in the future, and it speeds
up extended attributes handling --- important on SELinux systems!
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso>
I am going to say NOTABUG; upstream made the decision 4 years ago, and kernels in the past 7 or 8 years CAN handle it, so I think this is a case of you just needing special configuration for compatibility with your very old systems.
If you have questions about update images etc, I expect the fedora mailing lists or forums would be the right place for that.
|