Bug 875605
Summary: | ramdisk /etc/mke2fs.conf [fstypes] stanza lacks "ext2" tag with inode_size=128 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Franklin (RHlists) <pf.rhlists> |
Component: | e2fsprogs | Assignee: | Eric Sandeen <esandeen> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 18 | CC: | esandeen, g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, josef, kzak, oliver, sbueno, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-11-13 16:24:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Paul Franklin (RHlists)
2012-11-12 07:35:33 UTC
The /etc/mke2fs.conf file comes from the package. We don't specifically write one out in lorax. Thank you for the response. If the e2fsprogs maintainer doesn't consider it a bug, will one of you tell me how to put my modified /etc/mke2fs.conf file into an updates.img file? It should be possible but I don't know how. Thanks. The default inode size changed from 128 to 256 4 years ago. When you say: "I have older operating systems which won't mount the new F18 "ext2" filesystem if it is created with an inode_size of 256, which is the default unless a specific filesystem tag overrides it (as I now do)." just how old are those operating systems; older than I think 2.6.10? Anyway, defaults changed upstream 4 years ago: commit b1631cce648ee87e39b602899d77ad59a81acc66 Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso> Date: Sun Jan 27 19:30:27 2008 -0500 Create new filesystems with 256-byte inodes by default This makes it easier to upgrade to ext4 in the future, and it speeds up extended attributes handling --- important on SELinux systems! Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso> I am going to say NOTABUG; upstream made the decision 4 years ago, and kernels in the past 7 or 8 years CAN handle it, so I think this is a case of you just needing special configuration for compatibility with your very old systems. If you have questions about update images etc, I expect the fedora mailing lists or forums would be the right place for that. |