Bug 876390
| Summary: | enabling firewalld on an existing system kills ssh and will not enable it | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Miller <mattdm> |
| Component: | firewalld | Assignee: | Thomas Woerner <twoerner> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jpopelka, twoerner |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-11-21 13:31:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Matthew Miller
2012-11-14 00:57:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > did systemctl enable firewalld. 'systemctl enable' AFAIK just makes the symlinks, it doesn't start the service. Did you mean 'systemctl start' ? Anyway, neither 'systemctl enable' nor 'systemctl start' does not freeze the connection in my case. Can't see what I do differently. > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. install clean system without firewalld I've thought firewalld has been in minimal install in F18. firewalld is actually enabled by default [1] when you install it, so 'systemctl enable firewalld.service' does nothing. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Starting_services_by_default (In reply to comment #1) > 'systemctl enable' AFAIK just makes the symlinks, it doesn't start the > service. > Did you mean 'systemctl start' ? Yes, sorry. > > Steps to Reproduce: > > 1. install clean system without firewalld > I've thought firewalld has been in minimal install in F18. It is installed by anaconda but isn't in the @core group, so it isn't currently added by tools like appliance-creator. Conceivably, we could have a minimal JEOS image which doesn't have it, but someone might want to add it later -- that's the specific case I'm worried about here. Ah. I'm not running NetworkManager. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 821938 *** |