Bug 876679

Summary: 32bit support in Fuse, related to special option nfs.enable-ino32
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Scott Haines <shaines>
Component: fuseAssignee: Niels de Vos <ndevos>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Anush Shetty <ashetty>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.0CC: aavati, csaba, cww, divya, gluster-bugs, grajaiya, joe, mhergaar, mkranz, ndevos, rhs-bugs, shaines, storage-doc, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Patch, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: Add support for clients mounting Red Hat Storage volumes that are not able to use 64-bit inodes. Reason: Some clients and applications are not able to use 64-bit inodes and can therefore not utilize native mountpoints from Red Hat Storage. Result (if any): The Red Hat Storage native client now accepts the "enable-ino32" mount-option that causes the filesystem to present 32-bit inodes instead of 64-bit ones. See https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/solutions/201483 for a more complete description.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 850352 Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-28 22:26:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 850352    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 3 Divya 2013-02-12 10:40:36 UTC
Niels,

This bug has been added to Update 4 errata. Could you provide your inputs in doc text field which will enable me to update errata??

Thanks,
Divya

Comment 4 Niels de Vos 2013-02-12 11:41:52 UTC
Doc Text updated, please check and update if needed. It contains a reference to
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/solutions/201483 which may or may not be
suitable.

Comment 9 Anush Shetty 2013-03-04 10:13:33 UTC
Moving it to verified with glusterfs-fuse-3.3.0.5rhs-43.el6rhs.x86_64

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-03-28 22:26:13 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0691.html