Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||CVE-2012-3509 mutrace: in bundled libiberty [fedora-rawhide]|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Gwyn Ciesla <limburgher>|
|Component:||mutrace||Assignee:||Lennart Poettering <lpoetter>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Target Milestone:||---||Keywords:||Security, SecurityTracking|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Release Note|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2012-11-21 11:44:07 EST||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Gwyn Ciesla 2012-11-15 09:39:17 EST
This package bundles libiberty, and may need to be patched based on the patch referenced in 860769.
Comment 1 Vincent Danen 2012-11-15 12:02:12 EST
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=849693,877018
Comment 2 Lennart Poettering 2012-11-19 17:45:08 EST
Hmm? mutrace does not use nor bundle libiberty. What is this about?
Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-11-20 08:17:37 EST
Comment 4 Vincent Danen 2012-11-20 19:41:27 EST
I didn't file this bug initially, I just linked it to the CVE bug and added the submission link info. Jon, you filed this bug and indicated it bundled libiberty. If that isn't the case, then it could probably be closed NOTABUG (I didn't check to see if it was bundled, honestly, due to lack of time so I just blindly put #c1 in there to assist with any forthcoming updates).
Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-11-21 08:35:37 EST
According to 849693 comment 29, I thought mutrace was affected, am I misunderstanding? I don't see libiberty here either.
Comment 6 Vincent Danen 2012-11-21 11:44:07 EST
Ah, it's exporting a symbol (if you looked at the list previous to it with the check for the actual source file, mutrace isn't noted), which is coming from here: mutrace-0.2/backtrace-symbols.c:#include <libiberty.h> So this is a red herring. I'm going to close this bug.
Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-11-21 11:49:12 EST
Ok, thanks for the clarification.