Bug 877647

Summary: Wrong setting of exec highlight
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Matěj Cepl <mcepl>
Component: cgitAssignee: Todd Zullinger <tmz>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: el6CC: kevin, mcepl, tmz
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-23 07:18:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matěj Cepl 2012-11-17 16:27:28 UTC
Description of problem:

See the bottom of /usr/libexec/cgit/filters/syntax-highlighting.sh

# highlight versions 2 and 3 have different commandline options. Specifically,
# the -X option that is used for version 2 is replaced by the -O xhtml option
# for version 3.
#
# Version 2 can be found (for example) on EPEL 5, while version 3 can be
# found (for example) on EPEL 6.
#
# This is for version 2
exec highlight --force -f -I -X -S "$EXTENSION" 2>/dev/null

# This is for version 3
#exec highlight --force -f -I -O xhtml -S "$EXTENSION" 2>/dev/null

Comment itself says that the other line should be uncommented for EPEL 6

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cgit-0.9.1-1.el6.i686

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Try to show any file with syntax highlighting enabled
(e.g., http://luther.ceplovi.cz/git/FlaskPodcatcher.git/tree/seed.py)
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Error 500

Expected results:
Nicely highlighted file

Additional info:

Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2012-11-17 18:02:58 UTC
Humf. I thought upstream defaulted to v3, but apparently not. ;( 

(also, it would be nice if they just detected this at compile time)

Oh well, no matter... updates on the way. Thanks for spotting this!

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2012-11-17 18:13:08 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cgit-0.9.1-2.fc18

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2012-11-17 18:25:52 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cgit-0.9.1-2.fc17

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2012-11-17 18:38:22 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cgit-0.9.1-2.el6

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2012-11-17 18:39:14 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cgit-0.9.1-2.fc16

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2012-11-17 19:48:40 UTC
Package cgit-0.9.1-2.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing cgit-0.9.1-2.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-13495/cgit-0.9.1-2.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2012-11-23 07:18:11 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-11-28 11:28:24 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-11-28 11:45:43 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-12-02 19:35:51 UTC
cgit-0.9.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.