Bug 877667

Summary: AttributeError: 'DeviceFormat' object has no attribute 'label'
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jeevan Savant <savjee>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 18CC: anaconda-maint-list, g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, sbueno, stephent98, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:251a3a5924168b3e2d3dc8a1cce482fbbd8da32da469a777fefdb4ed27fc5b82
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-30 03:02:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: ifcfg.log
none
File: anaconda-tb
none
File: product
none
File: type
none
File: environ
none
File: storage.log
none
File: version
none
File: program.log
none
File: anaconda.log
none
File: syslog
none
File: hashmarkername
none
File: packaging.log
none
File: cmdline_file
none
File: release
none
File: description none

Description Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:35 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
anaconda-18.6.8

Additional info:
libreport version: 2.0.12
cmdline:        /usr/bin/python  /sbin/anaconda
kernel:         3.6.0-0.rc2.git2.1.fc18.x86_64

Comment 1 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:38 UTC
Created attachment 646884 [details]
File: ifcfg.log

Comment 2 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:40 UTC
Created attachment 646885 [details]
File: anaconda-tb

Comment 3 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:42 UTC
Created attachment 646886 [details]
File: product

Comment 4 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:44 UTC
Created attachment 646887 [details]
File: type

Comment 5 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:45 UTC
Created attachment 646888 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:47 UTC
Created attachment 646889 [details]
File: storage.log

Comment 7 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:50 UTC
Created attachment 646890 [details]
File: version

Comment 8 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:52 UTC
Created attachment 646891 [details]
File: program.log

Comment 9 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:54 UTC
Created attachment 646892 [details]
File: anaconda.log

Comment 10 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:56 UTC
Created attachment 646893 [details]
File: syslog

Comment 11 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:31:57 UTC
Created attachment 646894 [details]
File: hashmarkername

Comment 12 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:32:06 UTC
Created attachment 646895 [details]
File: packaging.log

Comment 13 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:32:07 UTC
Created attachment 646896 [details]
File: cmdline_file

Comment 14 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:32:09 UTC
Created attachment 646897 [details]
File: release

Comment 15 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-17 18:32:11 UTC
Created attachment 646898 [details]
File: description

Comment 16 Steve Tyler 2012-11-17 21:12:35 UTC
/proc/cmdline:
initrd=initrd.img inst.stage2=LABEL=Fedora\x2018-Alpha\x20x86_64 rd.live.check BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz 

F18-Beta hasn't been released yet, but you can test a pre-release version from here:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/

ATM, the latest is 18-Beta-TC9/:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/18-Beta-TC9/

The F18 release schedule is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/18/Schedule

Comment 17 Jesse Keating 2012-11-20 18:24:15 UTC
Please retest with the images that were linked to in comment 16

Comment 18 Jeevan Savant 2012-11-29 21:51:17 UTC
I retested with the FC18-Beta released earlier this week. Encountered the same issue, reported it through 881969 against FC18-Beta. 

Install is using ISO mounted over IPMI.

Comment 19 Chris Lumens 2012-11-30 03:02:33 UTC
I'm going to dup this one to the new bug you filed, since it appears to be the same and that bug is already assigned to the right place.  Thanks for retesting.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 881969 ***