Bug 877721

Summary: collectd 5.2 update
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Florian La Roche <florian.laroche>
Component: collectdAssignee: Alan Pevec (Fedora) <apevec>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: apevec, apevec, kevin, mail, rjones, steve.traylen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: collectd-5.2.0-1.fc19 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-10 07:11:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch to migrate .spec to 5.2 none

Description Florian La Roche 2012-11-18 10:18:54 UTC
Description of problem:

collectd 5.2 is released upstream, even 5.1 was released in April this year.

rawhide should take in this newest release to stay current.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2012-11-21 22:46:21 UTC
Created attachment 649444 [details]
Patch to migrate .spec to 5.2

Patch to use .spec file with collectd 5.2

Comment 2 Alan Pevec 2012-11-23 18:53:10 UTC
ok, what about this plan:
f17 - 4.10.x
f18 - 5.1.x
f19 - 5.2.x
el6 - 4.10.x
el6 - new package collectd5 (don't know status, I'm not involved)

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2012-11-23 23:25:56 UTC
Sounds fine to me... except perhaps we could get 5.2.x in f18 before release and have one less version to worry about. 

I don't know the collectd5 status off hand either. I've not had time to look at it.

Comment 4 Steve Traylen 2012-11-26 09:45:29 UTC
Think there may be a small patch needed with the 5.2  packages.

The rrd module writes rrds to '/var/lib/collectd' where as the cgi
script looks for them in '/var/lib/collectd/rrd' . I suggest the latter
is more sensible.

Steve.

Comment 5 Alan Pevec 2012-11-26 12:31:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Think there may be a small patch needed with the 5.2  packages.
> 
> The rrd module writes rrds to '/var/lib/collectd' where as the cgi
> script looks for them in '/var/lib/collectd/rrd' . I suggest the latter
> is more sensible.

/etc/collectd.d/rrdtool.conf is generated in spec:
<Plugin rrdtool>
       DataDir "/var/lib/collectd/rrd"
       CacheTimeout 120
       CacheFlush   900
</Plugin>

Are you saying this doesn't have an effect in 5.2 ?

Comment 6 Alan Pevec 2012-11-26 12:37:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sounds fine to me... except perhaps we could get 5.2.x in f18 before release
> and have one less version to worry about. 

ok,  collectd seems stable enough, although in general .0 are best to be avoided :)
It does bump libcollectdclient.so.1 but I don't think any other package links to it.

Comment 7 Alan Pevec 2012-12-02 10:36:56 UTC
patch for python plugin
http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/2012-November/005494.html

Comment 8 Steve Traylen 2012-12-03 09:50:54 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> > The rrd module writes rrds to '/var/lib/collectd' where as the cgi
> > script looks for them in '/var/lib/collectd/rrd' . I suggest the latter
> > is more sensible.
> 
> /etc/collectd.d/rrdtool.conf is generated in spec:
> <Plugin rrdtool>
>        DataDir "/var/lib/collectd/rrd"
>        CacheTimeout 120
>        CacheFlush   900
> </Plugin>
> 
> Are you saying this doesn't have an effect in 5.2 ?

Apologies, my mistake, I was overriding the default configuration.

Comment 9 Alan Pevec 2012-12-06 12:58:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> patch for python plugin
> http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/2012-November/005494.html

I could not reproduce this, so I'll go ahead and update f18 to 5.2.0

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-12-06 13:18:43 UTC
collectd-5.2.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/collectd-5.2.0-1.fc18

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2012-12-06 20:16:28 UTC
Package collectd-5.2.0-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing collectd-5.2.0-1.fc18'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-19865/collectd-5.2.0-1.fc18
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 12 Alan Pevec 2012-12-09 10:53:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sounds fine to me... except perhaps we could get 5.2.x in f18 before release
> and have one less version to worry about. 

If you want to see 5.2.0 in F18 release, please test and give karma before freeze on Tuesday!

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-19865/collectd-5.2.0-1.fc18

Comment 13 Kevin Fenzi 2012-12-09 19:11:44 UTC
Done. ;)

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2012-12-10 07:11:17 UTC
collectd-5.2.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.