Bug 877810
| Summary: | Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-trio - Extended implementation of printf and scanf for gLite | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | František Dvořák <valtri> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Petr Šabata <psabata> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | notting, package-review, psabata |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | psabata:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-08-23 00:42:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
František Dvořák
2012-11-18 22:56:50 UTC
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-1/glite-lbjp-common-trio.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-1/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-1.fc20.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5567255 New upstream release and packaging improvements (based on reviews of related packages). Taking this one too. (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #0) > - I don't have a sponsor I might help you with that :) (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #2) > (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #0) > > - I don't have a sponsor > > I might help you with that :) I forgot to mention, I already have the sponsor. But thanks anyway, and thanks for taking the review. :-) The only issue I've found is the licence. More than a half of the project actually uses ISC. Correct the Licence tag to "ASL 2.0 and ISC" and I'll approve the review :) I see, it is not re-licensed under ASL (and there is no reason to). The other license should be mentioned. :-) The original project claims they have MIT-like license, but its variant is identical to ISC (http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/trio/). Should we use "ASL 2.0 and MIT" instead? Since it's actually ISC, I vote for "ASL 2.0 and ISC". However, putting a comment about this in the spec won't hurt either. Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2/glite-lbjp-common-trio.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc20.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5691196 OK, let's use ISC. :-) Created a new version 2.3.10-2. Ok, approving. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: glite-lbjp-common-trio Short Description: Extended implementation of printf and scanf for gLite Owners: valtri Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc19 glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc18 glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.el6 glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. |