Bug 878874
| Summary: | mount point broke on client when a lun from a storage backend offline or missing . After there the data are scrap | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Vidya Sakar <vinaraya> |
| Component: | glusterfs | Assignee: | Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Sachidananda Urs <surs> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 2.0 | CC: | ahuser, gluster-bugs, rfortier, rhs-bugs, shaines, vbellur |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 874348 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2012-12-11 09:52:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 874348 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Vidya Sakar
2012-11-21 12:59:55 UTC
Not a valid deployment scenario for RHS. Closing this bug. I'm not understand why it is not a bug? I have two server in replicated mode. One server lost a harddrive or cable or controller or an other part. The complete high availability of this replicated volume are lost. RedHat recommend format the volume with xfs. But with xfs i have a faulty volume when one server have a problem. Is GlusterFS in replicated mode not for high availability? Or what make i wrong? Many thanks Andreas (In reply to comment #3) > I'm not understand why it is not a bug? > I have two server in replicated mode. One server lost a harddrive or cable > or controller or an other part. The complete high availability of this > replicated volume are lost. RedHat recommend format the volume with xfs. But > with xfs i have a faulty volume when one server have a problem. > Is GlusterFS in replicated mode not for high availability? > Or what make i wrong? > Please note that this bug is not relevant to product Red Hat Storage. For GlusterFS, this is still relevant and the issue will continue to be tracked through the original bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874348 Thanks, Vijay okay i understand sorry. it gives two reports one for glusterfs and one for Red Hat Storage. And the bug report for glusterfs is still open. thanks Andreas |