Bug 879725

Summary: [admin-portal] - the text displayed for announcing a new RHEV-Hypervisor version is not clear enough [TEXT]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Chris Pelland <cpelland>
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portalAssignee: Alexey Chub <achub>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.1.0CC: aburden, bazulay, dyasny, ecohen, iheim, Rhev-m-bugs, sgrinber, ykaul, yzaslavs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: 3.1.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: infra
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, when a new ISO was available, the displayed message was ambiguous. Now, the message is more clear: "A new RHEV-Hypervisor version is available, an upgrade option will appear once the host is moved to maintenance mode."
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 871823 Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-15 15:13:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Infra RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 871823    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Chris Pelland 2012-11-23 22:30:26 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #871823 +++

Per  Pavel Stehlik's comment in BZ#842767 comment#30

Opening a new [TEXT] bug

In case new ISO is available user can see this message: "Upgrade or reinstall RHEV Hypervisor." I like much more the older variation: " Anew RHEV-Hypervisor version is available, an upgrade option will appear once the host is moved to maintenance mode."  - the older is correct as it contains clear explanation what to do, please return it back.

--- Additional comment from Barak on 2012-11-01 05:54:08 EDT ---

Simon, Miki, 
please provide feedback on the text istelf

--- Additional comment from Simon Grinberg on 2012-11-01 10:46:38 EDT ---

The old one seems fine to me, I guess this is a tool tip or an event log?

--- Additional comment from Pavel Stehlik on 2012-11-06 13:11:55 EST ---

I don't have that env now, it was 100% in General subtab on Hosts tab (I'd guess also in log - but it's a guess only).

--- Additional comment from Alexey Chub on 2012-11-14 07:32:44 EST ---

Change-Id: If65f9d3d10055ebcd5e738571ed3a75641314117
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9238/

Comment 1 Alexey Chub 2012-12-02 12:44:30 UTC
Change-Id: If65f9d3d10055ebcd5e738571ed3a75641314117
https://gerrit.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com/#/c/3541/

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2013-01-15 15:13:06 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0003.html