Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Alex <aadavis1>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||misc, notting, package-review|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2012-11-26 06:37:42 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Alex 2012-11-25 12:26:30 EST
Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~aadavis1/packaging/rssh.spec SRPM URL:http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~aadavis1/packaging/rssh-2.3.3-3.fc17.src.rpm Description: hi I just finish packaging up rssh and I would appreciate a review so that I can get into fedora extras. Fedora Account System Username:aadavis1
Comment 1 Michael Scherer 2012-11-26 06:37:42 EST
Rssh is already in Fedora, so closing this bug.
Comment 2 Alex 2012-11-26 08:11:03 EST
yes but which release?
Comment 3 Michael Scherer 2012-11-26 08:45:53 EST
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rssh 2.3.3 However, the package seems to be orphaned, so someone need to take care of it. Are you willing to do it ? That's the same as pushing the new version, except the procedure is a little bit different. ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers for the procedure ) ?
Comment 4 Alex 2012-11-26 08:56:45 EST
in order for it to be process I have to change the version? or the release? according to my course it has to be fully maintain not orphaned. got to check with ctyler first, not sure.
Comment 5 Alex 2012-11-26 13:51:02 EST
yeah i am willing to do it
Comment 6 Michael Scherer 2012-11-26 16:47:58 EST
Nice, so I guess you should start right now, the first step is to send a email on fedora-devel, to see why it was orphaned. make sure to also explain that you are not yet a packager and that you look for a sponsor.
Comment 7 Alex 2012-11-26 19:27:33 EST
should I mail to this devel? email@example.com
Comment 8 Kevin Fenzi 2012-11-26 19:36:23 EST
No. devel-owner goes only to the admin(s) of the list. You should subscribe, then mail 'firstname.lastname@example.org'.
Comment 9 Alex 2012-11-26 20:10:19 EST
I sent it I have a few questions: 1) for the packager database, should the ownership be taken if devel approves or should I add myself to the list? 2) is svc-admin a git repo command line or a packager database?
Comment 10 Michael Scherer 2012-11-27 00:59:16 EST
1) I think you can do it yourself once you are in the packager group in the account system ( FAS ). But you first need a sponsor. 2) mhh, I do not understand the question, can you explain where do you see scv-admin ?