Bug 880579

Summary: Warning info show when register to sam if register to public rhn first.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: cshao <cshao>
Component: ovirt-nodeAssignee: Joey Boggs <jboggs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 5.9CC: bsarathy, chchen, gouyang, hadong, jboggs, leiwang, mburns, ovirt-maint, ycui
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-07 15:34:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
ovirt.log none

Description cshao 2012-11-27 11:25:14 UTC
Description of problem:
register to public RHN first, and then register to SAM, warning info show as follows:

Registering to RHN account.....
WARNING
You have already registered with spacewalk.
The system has been registered with id: e53e0791-27d3-4ed1-b04c-9206a835b97c 
Installed Product Current Status:
'DefaultBranding' object has no attribute 'REGISTERED_TO_BOTH_SUMMARY'
Error registering to RHN account!

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor5-5.9-20121114.2.el5
subscription-manager-1.0.24-1.el5
sam-1.2-20121120
katello-headpin-all-1.2.6-2h.el6_3

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEV-H and register to public rhn.
2. Register to SAM.
3.
  
Actual results:
1. Warning info show when register to sam if register to public rhn first.
2. Register to sam can successful.

Expected results:
1. Register to SAM can successful without warning info.

Additional info:
1. No such issue on rhev-hypervisor5-5.9-20120808.0.el5, so it's a regression from 5.8 to 5.9.
2. Can reproduce the same issue with rhevh-5.9-20121123.2.

Comment 1 cshao 2012-11-27 11:26:03 UTC
Created attachment 652637 [details]
ovirt.log

Comment 2 cshao 2012-11-27 11:32:41 UTC
> Additional info:
> 1. No such issue on rhev-hypervisor5-5.9-20120808.0.el5, so it's a regression  from 5.8 to 5.9.
> 2. Can reproduce the same issue with rhevh-5.9-20121123.2.

Update Additional info:
1. No such issue on rhev-hypervisor5-5.8-20120808.0.el5_8, so it's a regression from 5.8 to 5.9.