Bug 88296

Summary: trigger script incorrectly edits modules.conf
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Stew Smith <stew.smith>
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 15:40:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Stew Smith 2003-04-08 17:24:50 UTC
Description of problem:
kernel-2.4.spec contains a trigger script which will basically always edit
modules.conf


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.4.18-27.7.x.src.rpm


How reproducible:
install kernel rpms built from the above source rpm

    
Actual results:
the trigger is run everytime, so you get multiple "options i810 xfreeversion=41"
entries in modules.conf


Expected results:
one entry of "options i810 xfreeversion=41" in modules.conf.


Additional info:


These (there are three) trigger scripts are the culprit:

%triggerin smp -- XFree86 < 4.2
-cat /etc/modules.conf 2>/dev/null | grep -v xfreeversion > /dev/null && ( echo
"options i810 xfreeversion=41" >> /etc/modules.conf ) || :

Here is the change I made (remove -v from grep, make the echo an || condition:

%triggerin smp -- XFree86 < 4.2
cat /etc/modules.conf 2>/dev/null | grep xfreeversion > /dev/null || ( echo
"options i810 xfreeversion=41" >> /etc/modules.conf ) || :

That way, it should only run if the string "xfreeversion" does not appear in the
file.

Comment 1 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:40:46 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/