Bug 885346

Summary: Please package freecell-solver-3.14.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Shlomi Fish <shlomif>
Component: distributionAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: dennis, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-10 16:32:07 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The src.rpm. none

Description Shlomi Fish 2012-12-08 19:33:30 UTC 
Created attachment 659993 [details]
The src.rpm.

Description of problem:

Freecell Solver ( http://fc-solve.shlomifish.org/ ) is not packaged on Fedora-based distributions. It enhances the user experience in the PySolFC package - see for example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYdqNuX4WJc .

There are already packages for Mandriva, Mageia, OpenSUSE (as well as Debian and Ubuntu).
    
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

3.14.1

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install freecell-solver
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

Was not installed.

Expected results:

Should be installed.

Additional info:

I am willing to assist with the maintenance of the package into the future. Freecell Solver should not be hard to maintain.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2012-12-10 16:29:02 UTC 
For information on how to join the package maintainers, please see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2012-12-10 16:32:07 UTC 
I've also added this package to the package wishlist - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist#E-G

For now, closing as DEFERRED. It can get reopened and moved to the Package Review component once we have a maintainer submitting it for review. (If you're willing to do that, you can put it there now.