Bug 886468

Summary: snmpd does not report error when clientaddr <ip>:<port> cannot bind to the specified port
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis>
Component: net-snmpAssignee: Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.3CC: dapospis, jsafrane, ksrot
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: In one of the previous Net-SNMP updates we extended 'clientaddr' and 'clientaddrUsesPort' configuration options to allow system administrators to set specific port for outgoing SNMP requests. When this port number was not usable, for example it was already used, SNMP tools and daemons did not report any error and used random port for outgoing requests. Consequence: SNMP requests were sent from unexpected ports, while the system administrator did not know about it. Fix: Report an error that requested port cannot be used. Result: System admin knows that something is wrong.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 840861
: 1086925 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-22 07:22:05 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 840861, 1877375    
Bug Blocks: 1086925    

Description Dalibor Pospíšil 2012-12-12 11:04:41 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #840861 +++

Description of problem:
Having following /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf file, if snmpd fails to bind the specified clientaddr port, it quietly uses random port instead. It should at least report some error to system log.

rocommunity public
[snmp] clientaddr 127.0.0.1:30000
trapsink localhost public

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
net-snmp-5.5-41.el6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. vi /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
2. nc -ul localhost 30000 (or have SELinux in enforcing mode)
3. service snmpd start
  
Actual results:
- traps are sent from random port and not from port 30000, which is taken by 'nc'
- system log is empty

Expected results:
- system log should show an error

Comment 1 Dalibor Pospíšil 2012-12-12 16:22:40 UTC
The trap is actually sent on IPv6 if the port 30000 is already used on IPv4. It seems like there is some kind of fallback to IPv6 implemented.

17:10:29.409052 IP6 (hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 52) ::1.46569 > ::1.162: [udp sum ok]  { SNMPv1 { Trap(29)  .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.10 192.168.122.206 coldStart 5 } }

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2012-12-13 09:21:07 UTC
You should have '[snmp] clientaddrUsesPort yes' in your snmpd.conf. With that, no trap is sent and I get in /var/log/messages:

Dec 13 11:17:17 rhel6 snmpd[29457]: getaddrinfo("localhost", NULL, ...): No address associated with hostname
Dec 13 11:17:17 rhel6 snmpd[29457]: snmpd: create_trap_session: 
Dec 13 11:17:17 rhel6 snmpd[29457]: /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 2: Error: cannot create trap2sink: localhost
Dec 13 11:17:17 rhel6 snmpd[29457]: net-snmp: 1 error(s) in config file(s)


I admit the first message is quite confusing. RHEL 6.4 misses patch fixed in 5.9 as #840861.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-12-17 06:47:17 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 5 Jan Safranek 2015-01-14 11:39:41 UTC
snmpd will now log "Cannot bind for clientaddr 127.0.0.1:30000: Address already in use"

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-22 07:22:05 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1385.html