Bug 887349
Summary: | fence_scsi man page should mention that configuring respective unfence is more than reasonable | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Jan Pokorný [poki] <jpokorny> | |
Component: | fence-agents | Assignee: | Marek Grac <mgrac> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | medium | |||
Version: | 6.4 | CC: | acathrow, cluster-maint, fdinitto, lnovich, mjuricek, slevine | |
Target Milestone: | rc | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | fence-agents-3.1.5-27.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 987070 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-21 07:16:57 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 865161, 893574, 893575, 987070 |
Description
Jan Pokorný [poki]
2012-12-14 17:53:02 UTC
The fence_scsi agent doesn't *require* unfencing, the cluster requires it. In other words, unfencing is a cluster concept. The fence_scsi agent can be used outside of cluster product, in which case unfencing is meaningless. NACK. Ah, ok. If it is not even recommendable in general (is it?), please close the bug. Well, the whole man page seems to talk about fence_scsi in the context of cluster, so this bug is completely valid. Let´s add a note, that when fence_scsi is used in a cluster context, unfecing should be configured/executed. This should make everybody happy. Fixed in upstream: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fence-agents.git/commit/?id=d6504496b019dcd6bd066dd398b898b87d4ddd49 I should add a similar note to the Cluster Administration manual so I'm cloning this as a documentation bug. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1562.html |