Bug 887747

Summary:	SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/httpd.worker from 'name_bind' accesses on the tcp_socket .
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Component:	abrt	Assignee:	abrt <abrt-devel-list>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	17	CC:	abrt-devel-list, desktop7.org, dominick.grift, dvlasenk, dwalsh, iprikryl, jfilak, jmoskovc, kklic, mgrepl, mmilata, mtoman
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:1a81d33be711d785aa36b72b81acbf94692aa2c86bd907d326e66e46378d2b89
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	887678	Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-12-20 12:26:21 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	887678
Bug Blocks:

Description Miroslav Grepl 2012-12-17 08:15:37 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #887678 +++

Additional info:
libreport version: 2.0.18
kernel:         3.6.10-2.fc17.x86_64


Potential duplicate bug: 773772

--- Additional comment from Desktop7.org on 2012-12-16 19:43:22 EST ---

Created attachment 664596 [details]
File: type

--- Additional comment from Desktop7.org on 2012-12-16 19:43:25 EST ---

Created attachment 664597 [details]
File: hashmarkername

--- Additional comment from Miroslav Grepl on 2012-12-17 03:03:16 EST ---

Could you attach AVC msg?

Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2012-12-17 08:17:16 UTC

Guys,
we don't see AVC msgs. Could you backport the same changes which you added to F18?

Thank you.

Comment 2 Jakub Filak 2012-12-17 08:40:56 UTC

Looks like that AVC msgs were unavailable at the reporting time. This could happen for several reasons. The first reason that comes to my mind is that user rejected to use the description field (AVC msgs).

Comment 3 Miroslav Grepl 2012-12-17 08:55:07 UTC

So we have changes which show AVC msgs in the comment also in F17, right?

Comment 4 Jakub Filak 2012-12-17 10:05:42 UTC

ABRT excludes only few really useless files (hostname, architecture, etc.) from bug report. AVC msgs are not excluded by default, therefore AVC msgs should be available at least as an attachment (but this bug has already been fixed (in F17 too) and AVC msgs should be always printed out in bz comment 0 under heading "Description of problem:").

Comment 5 Jiri Moskovcak 2012-12-20 12:26:21 UTC

It's actually a dupe of 873783

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 873783 ***