Bug 887806

Summary:	[RHSC] RFE: Field to display Volume ID
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Shruti Sampat <ssampat>
Component:	rhsc	Assignee:	Kanagaraj <kmayilsa>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Shruti Sampat <ssampat>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	2.0	CC:	dtsang, kmayilsa, mmahoney, pprakash, psriniva, rhs-bugs, sabose, sankarshan, shaines
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	qa10	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Previously the UUID was not visible to you. Now a new field is added to the 'Summary' sub-tab of 'Volumes' tab to display the UUID of the selected volume.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-09-16 03:12:33 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Shruti Sampat 2012-12-17 11:52:38 UTC

Description of problem:
---------------------------------------
There should be a field in the Console to display the Volume ID of a volume.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Shruti Sampat 2013-04-24 11:25:04 UTC

Verified as fixed in  Red Hat Storage Console Version: 2.1.0-0.qa10.el6rhs.

Volume ID is displayed as part of Summary for a volume.

Comment 3 Pavithra 2013-08-20 10:33:39 UTC

Kindly review the edited doc text and sign off.

Comment 4 Kanagaraj 2013-08-20 11:11:42 UTC

doc text looks fine to me.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-09-16 03:12:33 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1263.html