Bug 88787

Summary: Inconsistent partition table error on update from RH8 to RH9
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Kim Lux <lux>
Component: partedAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-11-03 16:54:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kim Lux 2003-04-14 05:51:05 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux)Description of problem:I'm upgrading from RH8, which has run very well for the last 6 months, toRH9.Before I reach the package upgrade options screen (Ie after selecting themouse and languages) I receive the following message on a warning window:(not quite verbatum)<paraphrase begins>The partition table on /dev/hda is inconsistent.The probable cause of this is Linux detected the BIOS geometry for/dev/hda incorrectly.  GNU Parted suspects the real geometry should be119159/16/63 not 7476/255/63.  You should check your BIOS first.You can inform Linux by adding the parameter hda=119150,16,63 to thecommand line.  (Or you can ignore it and fix it later.)  <paraphrase ends>So, I rebooted the computer without doing anything and rebooted into theBIOS manager.  Here I had the BIOS detect the hard drive geometry, whereit found it to be 29437/16 heads/255 sectors. We've now got 3 different geometries:  What Linux is installed with ie7476/255/63, what GNU Parted thinks it is ie 119159/16/63 and what theBIOS says it is ie 29437/16/255.Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):From RH9 CDROMHow reproducible:AlwaysSteps to Reproduce:1. Reboot and run RH9 disk 1 from CDROM	2. Select english, english USA and 2 button mouse for upgrading	3.    Actual Results:  The error window mentioned above appears.Expected Results:  Dunno.  Has my partition table been wrong all along ?  Is the BIOS finding the drive parameters correctly ?  Additional info:The hard drive is a 60GB Maxtor.   The processor is an AMD 2GHz Athalon.  I've forgotten what the brand of the motherboard is. The system has worked very well for the last 6 months.   No lockups, no crashes, etc.  I sometimes get a complaint about hard drive dma issues in dmesg.Let me know if you need to see more.

Comment 1 Kim Lux 2003-04-14 18:52:51 UTC
I forgot to mention that the filesystem for /dev/hda is ext3.  I get this when run in RH8:  # /sbin/hdparm -g /dev/hda /dev/hda:  geometry     = 7476/255/63, sectors = 120103200, start = 0   

Comment 2 Kim Lux 2003-04-14 18:52:53 UTC
I forgot to mention that the filesystem for /dev/hda is ext3.  I get this when run in RH8:  # /sbin/hdparm -g /dev/hda /dev/hda:  geometry     = 7476/255/63, sectors = 120103200, start = 0   

Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2004-06-25 18:59:51 UTC
Does this still happen with newer releases?

Comment 4 Kim Lux 2004-11-03 16:54:51 UTC
I no longer run this installation.  I can't provide more information.