Bug 888207
| Summary: | Cacti included non-free Java Scripts files. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | mejiko <private> |
| Component: | cacti | Assignee: | Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | david.yaffe, gwync, javanree, ktdreyer, patrick.flaherty |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | cacti-0.8.8b-1.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-08-30 23:38:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 182235 | ||
|
Description
mejiko
2012-12-18 09:44:45 UTC
Blocking FE-Legal, This is license problem. Im Sorry, number "679980" is Debian BTS bug number, not Red hat bugzilla bug number. cacti-0.8.8a-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-5.fc18 I've verified that 0.8.8a-5 works on F19 and EL6 so I plan to push it to updates-testing and epel-testing for all branches. cacti-0.8.8a-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-5.fc17 cacti-0.8.8a-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-5.el6 cacti-0.8.8a-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-5.el5 Package cacti-0.8.8a-5.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing cacti-0.8.8a-5.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0234/cacti-0.8.8a-5.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Proposing for Fedora 18 NTH (Removing Fedora 18 NTH bug.) There is a problem with the graph implementation in 0.8.8a-5. It cannot display trees more than one level deep. Any leaves more than one level deep are automatically expanded and flattened out. This makes it hard to navigate a multi-level menu. Bug is still present in 0.8.8a-7 for Fedora 19 Hi Jan-Albert, The original author in Debian has a new patch to address the multi-level tree issue. I haven't yet had time to test or implement this new patch, but the details are here: http://bugs.cacti.net/view.php?id=2228 This message is a reminder that Fedora 17 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 17. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '17'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 17 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. bumping to rawhide so this doesn't get auto-closed. cacti-0.8.8a-8.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-8.fc19 cacti-0.8.8a-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-8.fc18 cacti-0.8.8a-8.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-8.el6 cacti-0.8.8a-8.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8a-8.el5 Package cacti-0.8.8a-8.el5: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing cacti-0.8.8a-8.el5' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-10854/cacti-0.8.8a-8.el5 then log in and leave karma (feedback). cacti-0.8.8a-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. cacti-0.8.8a-8.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. cacti-0.8.8b-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8b-1.el6 cacti-0.8.8b-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cacti-0.8.8b-1.el5 cacti-0.8.8b-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. cacti-0.8.8b-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. cacti-0.8.8b-1.el6 in Fedora EPEL 6 still has a non-interactive treeview. There's plenty of jquery references in the source in the javascript files are there, is it supposed to be interactive right now? I think the jquery tree implementation simply did not receive enough code review before shipping. It's unfortunate because we really didn't have an option to continue shipping the non-free code, so we had to take what we could get. Do you mind opening a separate bug for your particular issue, and including some more details about the problems you're seeing? *** Bug 1163872 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |