Bug 891074
| Summary: | 3.1.z - vdsm: Cannot find master domain errors from vdsm after creating posix domain with ext4 fs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Chris Pelland <cpelland> |
| Component: | vdsm | Assignee: | Yeela Kaplan <ykaplan> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Dafna Ron <dron> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | abaron, acathrow, bazulay, chetan, cpelland, dron, ewarszaw, iheim, ilvovsky, jrankin, lpeer, oourfali, pm-eus, prasanna.h.kulkarni, sgordon, ykaul |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | 6.3 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | storage | ||
| Fixed In Version: | vdsm-4.9.6-45.0 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously remote storage domains were identified in the same way as local storage domains due to incorrect internal names being assigned by VDSM. As a result creating a new POSIX file system storage domain backed by storage that was local to the host(s) resulted in the error "Cannot find master storage domain" being returned. VDSM has been updated to correct this issue. Creation of POSIX file systems backed by storage that is local to the host(s) now works correctly.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-02-04 21:12:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 886533, 891079 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Chris Pelland
2013-01-01 15:00:13 UTC
verified on si26 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0228.html |