Bug 891874

Summary:	mark ipa-server-trust-ad as optional in the identity management server group
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Martin Kosek <mkosek>
Component:	releng	Assignee:	Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.4	CC:	abokovoy, asn, atodorov, borgan, dpal, lsoft-tool-inc, ltroan, masaki.kimura.kz, mganisin, mgracik, mkosek, sbose, ssorce, tlavigne, wdh
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Regression
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	890644	Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 10:01:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	890644
Bug Blocks:	784640, 785929

Comment 1 Marian Ganisin 2013-01-07 15:18:27 UTC

Just copying important sentence to have this bugreport little bit more understandable:

As ipa-server-trust-ad is not required for basic IPA server function (only when AD trusts are being configured), move it to list of Optional Packages in Identity Management Server to avoid this kind of conflicts.

All the details are in initial Description.

Comment 2 Dennis Gregorovic 2013-01-07 20:17:23 UTC

done

Comment 4 Martin Kosek 2013-01-08 08:47:06 UTC

*** Bug 890281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2013-01-08 22:18:08 UTC

*** Bug 890158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Alexander Todorov 2013-01-14 12:02:52 UTC

<packagereq type='optional'>ipa-server-trust-ad</packagereq>

in @identity-management-server

Comment 9 Marian Ganisin 2013-01-14 12:11:52 UTC

Still ipa-server-trust-ad can cause samba conflicts (and very likely it will) if manually selected. If it remains in comps available for selection via GUI it seems to be good idea to highlight this risk in release notes and/or documentation.

Comment 10 Sumit Bose 2013-01-14 12:22:17 UTC

The conflict and how to solve it is already mentioned the the Doc Text of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766179 .

Comment 11 Martin Kosek 2013-01-14 12:27:36 UTC

*** Bug 890644 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Dmitri Pal 2013-01-24 05:48:29 UTC

*** Bug 890158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 10:01:53 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0379.html