Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 89201

Summary: krb5-1.2.8-1.src.rpm fails to compile with autoconf-2.57-3
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide Reporter: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro>
Component: krb5Assignee: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: other   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-02-26 12:18:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Felipe Alfaro Solana 2003-04-20 17:53:15 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Description of problem:
I'm unable to compile krb5-1.2.8.src.rpm if autoconf-2.57-3 (the one that comes
with Red Hat Linux 9) is installed. During the compilation process, the build
stops complaining that autoconf doesn't recognize the "--localdir" and
"--macrodir" arguments.

To fix the problem, I uninstalled autoconf-2.57-3 and installed
autoconf213-2.13-6 instead, and then made a symbolic link from
/usr/bin/autoconf-2.13 to /usr/bin/autoconf. This time, I was able to recompile
the SRPM successfully.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
krb5-1.2.8-1.src.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download krb5-1.2.8-1.src from RawHide
2. Make sure autocong-2.57-3 is installed
3. rpmbuild --rebuild krb5-1.2.8-1.src.rpm
    

Actual Results:  Building of the source package fails complaining that autconf
doesn't support the "--localdir" or "--macrodir" command-line parameter.

Expected Results:  It should be possible to compile krb5-1.2.8-1.src.rpm using
autoconf-2.57-3.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2004-02-26 12:18:50 UTC
I'm closing this pretty old bug as current Kerberos V packages are 
at upstream release 1.3. 
 
If anyone is still experiencing this, please consider upgrading to 
latest Kerberos V packages and open a new bug is this problem 
persists.