Bug 8922
Summary: | Anaconda fix fails | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | saerickson |
Component: | installer | Assignee: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | saerickson, srevivo |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2000-04-17 17:35:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
saerickson
2000-01-27 14:51:32 UTC
If you are no longer getting the error about "unscriptable object" then the fix that we provided did indeed work. What error message are you getting now? Submit those details and we will work to replicate in the test lab. Anaconda is the installer itself. I said that the first fixed worked because it did. By getting rid of the non-rpm files in the RPMS directory, you are no longer getting the "unscriptable object" error. This is because you no longer have an unscriptable object. I really need the error message that you are getting relative to sndconfig. There could be 100 different error message that you are receiving. These range from the installer not being able to find the sndconfig package in order to installer it to the installation of the sndconfig package failed when the installer attempted to place it on the system. I have no record of anyone reporting an error related to sndconfig, so therefore I need some context for this error, otherwise there is no chance that I am going to be able to replicate this situation in the lab. |