Bug 894600
| Summary: | Review Request: coin-or-cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Christopher Meng <i> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | anto.trande, i, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | i:
fedora-review?
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-04-11 18:21:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 894585, 894586, 894587, 1197488 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 894609 | ||
|
Description
Paulo Andrade
2013-01-12 15:18:11 UTC
Unlike the other coin-or packages being submitted for review, this one uses an unmodified upstream tarball. Update: - Update to latest upstream release. Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-cppad.spec SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-cppad-20130114-1.fc19.src.rpm Actually, there is already a cppad package in fedora. Noticed it when looking at packages that failed mass rebuild... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/cppad Update to 20140421 please. Christopher, you already have assigned to yourself tens of (pending) package reviews including one reported by me (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074046). I don't know what makes you think to be able to review this one, too. (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5) > Christopher, > > you already have assigned to yourself tens of (pending) package reviews > including one reported by me > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074046). > > I don't know what makes you think to be able to review this one, too. I intended to finish yours last weekend, but I couldn't use my computer. (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5) > > Christopher, > > > > you already have assigned to yourself tens of (pending) package reviews > > including one reported by me > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074046). > > > > I don't know what makes you think to be able to review this one, too. > > I intended to finish yours last weekend, but I couldn't use my computer. To me, it would be more correct to complete (when possible) all previous reviews before taking other ones. @Paulo Sorry for this hitch. cppad-20140728 is available. I believe this review can be closed, and instead rely on the existing cppad package in Fedora, that is being actively maintained, and was already in Fedora before I started working on the coin-or packages. I made extra requests for the cppad package as the initial patch was done incorrectly, it failed to provide coin-or-cppad-devel. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197488 But in the meantime I adjusted the package that would require it to only require cppad-devel, so, the next review for the coin-or stack is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 coin-or-OS is actually the last one, to match the coin-or monolithic tarball, after that, mostly optimizations and optional packages could be added. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1197488 *** |