Bug 894666

Tried building in mock (+ updates-testing + nodejs-traverse) but it requires npm(charm) as well:

DEBUG util.py:264:  Error: Package: nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-1.fc18.noarch (/nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-1.fc18.noarch)
DEBUG util.py:264:             Requires: npm(charm) < 0.1
DEBUG util.py:264:             Installing: nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18.noarch (updates-testing)
DEBUG util.py:264:                 npm(charm) = 0.1.0

Not sure what's going on here.  nodejs-charm appears to be in F18 updates-testing here.

% yum provides 'npm(charm)'
nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18.noarch : ANSI control sequences for terminal cursor hopping and colors
Repo        : updates-testing
Matched from:
Provides    : npm(charm) = 0.1.0

% yum info nodejs-charm
Available Packages
Name        : nodejs-charm
Arch        : noarch
Version     : 0.1.0
Release     : 1.fc18
Size        : 10 k
Repo        : updates-testing/18/x86_64
Summary     : ANSI control sequences for terminal cursor hopping and colors
URL         : https://github.com/substack/node-charm
License     : MIT
Description : Uses ANSI control sequences to write colors and cursor positions to terminals.

It's the version dependency that's the problem. nodejs-difflet is asking for nodejs-charm 0.0.x whereas the version in updates-testing is 0.1.0 so you need to patch this out:

$ cat rpmbuild/SOURCES/nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-deps.patch 
diff -Naur a/package.json b/package.json
--- a/package.json
+++ b/package.json
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
     },
     "dependencies" : {
         "traverse" : "0.6.x",
-        "charm" : "0.0.x",
+        "charm" : ">=0.0.0",
         "deep-equal" : "0.0.x"
     },
     "devDependencies" : {

Oh, sorry about that.  Fixed now.

Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-difflet.spec
SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc18.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4954713

Package Review
==============

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
     Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: %defattr present but not needed
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[-]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
     Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: Buildroot is not present
     Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[ ]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
     Note: Source0 (difflet-0.2.3.tgz)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc19.noarch.rpm
          nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc19.src.rpm
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/difflet/node_modules/traverse /usr/lib/node_modules/traverse
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/difflet/node_modules/deep-equal /usr/lib/node_modules/deep-equal
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/difflet/node_modules/charm /usr/lib/node_modules/charm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint nodejs-difflet
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/difflet/node_modules/traverse /usr/lib/node_modules/traverse
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/difflet/node_modules/deep-equal /usr/lib/node_modules/deep-equal
nodejs-difflet.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/difflet/node_modules/charm /usr/lib/node_modules/charm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc19.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    
    nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.0
    npm(charm) < 0.2
    npm(charm) >= 0.1.0
    npm(deep-equal) < 0.1
    npm(deep-equal) >= 0.0
    npm(traverse) < 0.7
    npm(traverse) >= 0.6



Provides
--------
nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc19.noarch.rpm:
    
    nodejs-difflet = 0.2.3-2.fc19
    npm(difflet) = 0.2.3



MD5-sum check
-------------
http://registry.npmjs.org/difflet/-/difflet-0.2.3.tgz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 819c4797abcbbb3689bff0dbd0094936c5faff0c03016913dedfc82e32379460
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 819c4797abcbbb3689bff0dbd0094936c5faff0c03016913dedfc82e32379460


Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (b71abc1) last change: 2012-10-16
Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec -n nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc19.src.rpm -p

The comma in the description should be changed to a period, but otherwise review approved!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: nodejs-difflet
Short Description: Colorful diffs for JavaScript objects
Owners: patches
Branches: f18 el6
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

nodejs-amdefine-0.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-buffer-equal-0.0.0-1.fc18, nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18, nodejs-deep-equal-0.0.0-2.fc18, nodejs-optimist-0.3.5-1.fc18, nodejs-source-map-0.1.8-3.fc18, nodejs-traverse-0.6.3-2.fc18, nodejs-wordwrap-0.0.2-2.fc18, nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc18, uglify-js1-1.3.4-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-amdefine-0.0.4-1.fc18,nodejs-buffer-equal-0.0.0-1.fc18,nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18,nodejs-deep-equal-0.0.0-2.fc18,nodejs-optimist-0.3.5-1.fc18,nodejs-source-map-0.1.8-3.fc18,nodejs-traverse-0.6.3-2.fc18,nodejs-wordwrap-0.0.2-2.fc18,nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18,nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc18,uglify-js1-1.3.4-1.fc18

nodejs-amdefine-0.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-buffer-equal-0.0.0-1.fc18, nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18, nodejs-deep-equal-0.0.0-2.fc18, nodejs-optimist-0.3.5-1.fc18, nodejs-source-map-0.1.8-3.fc18, nodejs-traverse-0.6.3-2.fc18, nodejs-wordwrap-0.0.2-2.fc18, nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc18, uglify-js1-1.3.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

nodejs-amdefine-0.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-buffer-equal-0.0.0-1.fc18, nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18, nodejs-deep-equal-0.0.0-2.fc18, nodejs-optimist-0.3.5-1.fc18, nodejs-source-map-0.1.8-3.fc18, nodejs-traverse-0.6.3-2.fc18, nodejs-wordwrap-0.0.2-2.fc18, nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc18, uglify-js1-1.3.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.