Bug 896033
| Summary: | Review Request: lcab - Cabinet File Creation Tool | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Simone Caronni <negativo17> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | mail, marcandre.lureau, notting, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-02-04 17:43:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Simone Caronni
2013-01-16 14:00:57 UTC
Just some quick comments - Please take a look at the guidelines about the numbering of Post-Release packages. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages - The COPYING file is missing in the %doc section - There is also a man page in the source. Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/lcab.spec SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/lcab-1.0-0.2.b12.fc17.src.rpm Thanks for the info, I updated everything. I've changed the first revision in the changelog to 0.1.b12 as well to keep it chronologically consistent. *** Bug 826685 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Can you please check your rpmlint output? There will be at least a warning about the license. According to the source it's GPLv2+. I would strongly recommend using gcab instead of lcab. lcab is poorly maintained, of low code quality, doesn't provide zip compression, nor translation. otoh, gcab is a tool and library that provides both compression and decompression, using GLib/GIO, providing GIR bindings, has a handful of translations already, and hopefully of better source code quality.It is a dependency of msitools (so it will end up in Fedora sooner or later), and I am maintaining it, it is very much "alive". Is there anything that lcab does that you need that gcab doesn't provide? See request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757 (In reply to comment #5) > Is there anything that lcab does that you need that gcab doesn't provide? > > See request: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895757 Thanks for the information, I did not notice it while doing the search, I've tried it and it surely is much better than lcab. I'm closing this review, I have no more interest in having lcab in Fedora. I'm taking gcab for review. Regards, --Simone |