Bug 896572
Summary: | [rfe] systemd targets indicating the level of network service | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ales Kozumplik <akozumpl> |
Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dcbw, jzeleny, pahan, samuel-rhbugs, tadej.j, thaller |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-09-13 16:17:48 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ales Kozumplik
2013-01-17 14:54:10 UTC
Same bug in the gnome bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688216 This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. I closed upstream bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688216#c5 as fixed by upstream release 1.2.0. As I read comment 0, points 1) and 3) are satisfied. Thus, it's fixed on Fedora 24, which ships NM >= 1.2.0 I am not convinced about starting a NetworkManager specific systemd-target (point 3)). If the user already buys into NetworkManager, maybe he can just monitor the D-Bus API of NetworkManager for the "Metered" property. On the other hand, it might be great to have a official systemd target for that (like the special targets network.target and network-online.target). Than it wouldn't be a NetworkManager-only thing. However, in face of multiple network-management-daemons, it's not clear who is responsible for starting/stopping this target and how multiple such daemons cooperate. Yes, definitely an interesting idea... but seems too much for this downstream bug and needs more discussion. Maybe better suited for the mailing list networkmanager-list or upstream https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=NetworkManager . Maybe it would be best if this becomes an official systemd-target, so maybe that would be best as an RFE for systemd and discuss the semantic of this there. |