Bug 89742
Summary: | New gcj java stuff interferes with common java packaging | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot> | ||||||||
Component: | jdkgcj | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> | ||||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |||||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||||
Version: | 9 | CC: | dgregor, fitzsim, rdieter, scop | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||
URL: | http://www.jpackage.org/ | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-08-03 01:30:14 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Nicolas Mailhot
2003-04-27 13:05:00 UTC
Right now the lone conflict with having libgcj installed and java-1.4.1-sun from JPackage is /usr/bin/jar which gets silently overwritten by update-alternatives -- I don't know if alternatives should throw an error if the symlink location is an existing file instead of another symlink. Jason Created attachment 101266 [details]
patch to resolve libgcj JPackage conflicts
This is how I'm proposing we fix the problem. Does it look like the right
approach?
I assume this needs to be updated following the latest discussion on jpackage-discuss Created attachment 101374 [details]
second attempt at a patch to resolve libgcj JPackage conflicts
Here's the updated patch.
Created attachment 101375 [details]
explanation script
Here's the script that is run if the user tries to run java or javac.
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-385.html |