Bug 8990
| Summary: | Y2K bug in dinbrief | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero> |
| Component: | tetex | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2001-03-23 10:17:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Do you have a small test case? I'm not a big user of dinbrief.. Closing; no feedback. |
The \yourmail{} macro in dinbrief generates non-Y2K compliant date lines (31.01.100) (Reported by mail from Martin.Brodbeck.de; sending it here where it belongs)