Bug 89988
Summary: | Want more descriptive name for "More" menus | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Toralf <bugzilla> |
Component: | redhat-menus | Assignee: | Havoc Pennington <hp> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-10-06 19:04:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Toralf
2003-04-30 21:05:52 UTC
Advanced, non-standard, or little-used. Things not immediately important to everyone. I'm not sure we're going to find one word that explains this, though open to suggestions. More is a simple word that's short and doesn't require lots of user thought. I would say that a general, fairly meaningless term like "more" requires more user thought than a more specific name. But I know, writing good texts for GUI items (i.e. ones that compeletely describes the functionality without being too long to be displayed in simple entries) can be really hard. I'll let you know if I come up with something better... Closing in the absence of a concrete suggestion. |