Bug 902571
Summary: | libQtWebKit.so.4.9.2 has an RPATH causing issues with library overrides for libfreetype.so | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Benjamin Lewis <ben.lewis> |
Component: | qtwebkit | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 18 | CC: | jreznik, rdieter, than |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-02-05 03:03:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Benjamin Lewis
2013-01-22 01:32:01 UTC
Good catch! I'll fix this up asap. I caught it since prelink.log was recording it on every run as being un-prelinkable due to dodgy dependencies. A quick scan across all of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin lists a not insubstantial number of executables with similar (not dangerous, just annoying) RPATHS that are not broken in the same way... yet! (mainly because the only library override I have is for libfreetype.so) Is is worth filing bugs against all of them? e.g. /usr/bin/testlibraw: RPATH=/usr/lib64 or the much less problematic, but still pointless: /usr/bin/xdvipdfmx: RPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/texlive-2012/source/inst/lib /usr/bin/xelatex: RPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/texlive-2012/source/inst/lib /usr/bin/xetex: RPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/texlive-2012/source/inst/lib [A little off topic, but I'm unsure where else to ask!] IMO, all of these items should have bugs, yeah. Priority are those that rpath %_libdir like here. Low priority items like your tex example, that rpath silly stuff. p.s. good work finding these! qtwebkit-2.2.2-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtwebkit-2.2.2-8.fc18 Package qtwebkit-2.2.2-8.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing qtwebkit-2.2.2-8.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1467/qtwebkit-2.2.2-8.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). qtwebkit-2.2.2-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |