Bug 902811
Summary: | Adding RHS-2.0-20130115.0-RHS-x86_64 based RHS Host, to a Cluster with Gluster feature checked, in RHEV-M, fails | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Rejy M Cyriac <rcyriac> |
Component: | build | Assignee: | Sahina Bose <sabose> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Prasanth <pprakash> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 2.0 | CC: | barumuga, grajaiya, mmahoney, mmccune, pprakash, rhs-bugs, rwheeler, shtripat, ssampat |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-08-10 07:47:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Rejy M Cyriac
2013-01-22 13:04:54 UTC
Additional information: I have confirmed that if a local yum repository with the vdsm packages are set-up, then the add Host completes successfully. However the same vdsm packages were already installed in the system, and this should have been detected earlier as well. It appears that the check process for installed and available packages and for system registration status is in-efficient and faulty. Bala, can you take a look at this? Could you tell me RHEV-M version you are using? (In reply to comment #5) > Could you tell me RHEV-M version you are using? The 'About' button on RHEV-M shows Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Version: 3.1.0-32.el6ev Some more information from the system: # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) # rpm -qa | grep -i rhev rhevm-restapi-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-sdk-3.1.0.16-1.el6ev.noarch rhevm-config-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-dbscripts-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-log-collector-3.1.0-9.el6ev.noarch rhevm-image-uploader-3.1.0-7.el6ev.noarch rhevm-backend-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-spice-client-x64-cab-3.1-8.el6.noarch rhevm-doc-3.1.0-21.el6eng.noarch rhevm-notification-service-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhev-guest-tools-iso-3.1-9.noarch rhevm-iso-uploader-3.1.0-8.el6ev.noarch rhevm-genericapi-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-spice-client-x86-cab-3.1-8.el6.noarch rhevm-setup-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-cli-3.1.0.17-1.el6ev.noarch rhevm-userportal-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-webadmin-portal-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch rhevm-tools-common-3.1.0-32.el6ev.noarch 'Add host' involving bootstrap process is served from RHEV-M and no code controls this in RHS. Assigning to Alon, Bootstrap maintainer of RHEV-M (In reply to comment #7) > > 'Add host' involving bootstrap process is served from RHEV-M and no code > controls this in RHS. Assigning to Alon, Bootstrap maintainer of RHEV-M This behavior is legacy and by design. host deploy will always look at the channel and not query the system. In the ovirt-3.2 using ovirt-host-deploy there is an option to perform offline mode, maybe it will be better for RHS. On 02/21/2013 11:35 AM, Gowrishankar Rajaiyan wrote: > On 02/21/2013 11:28 AM, Scott Haines wrote: >> On 02/20/2013 09:46 PM, Shireesh Anjal wrote: >>> As mentioned by Alon on the BZ, this behavior is by design. The system >>> must either be registered to the channel, or have a local repository >>> containing the required packages. It is *not* a blocker as I believe we >>> expect customers to register to the channel if in production. >>> >>> I remember that in beta2, we did not want the customer to have the >>> hassle of registering to channel - install and ready to go. In that >>> release, we had made sure that the ISO contains a local repository with >>> required packages and hence this works. >> >> So, close, not a bug? > > No, please put it ON_QA. Verified as fixed in RHS-2.0-20130219.3-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso Adding a RHS server, based on RHS-2.0-20130219.3-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso build, as a host to a Cluster with Gluster feature checked, in RHEV-M, now succeeds without any error. Hi sabose, not sure what I can do farther. |