Bug 903651

Summary:	Update jeos AMI's for RHEL-5.9
Product:	[Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine	Reporter:	Chris Pelland <cpelland>
Component:	imagefactory	Assignee:	jrd <jrd>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Rehana <aeolus-qa-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	1.1.0	CC:	athomas, dajohnso, dmacpher, jlaska
Target Milestone:	1.1.2	Keywords:	Triaged, ZStream
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	This enhancement adds support for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.9 Amazon Machine Images (AMI) on EC2 providers for CloudForms Cloud Engine.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	889341	Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 19:08:50 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	881404, 889341, 903650
Bug Blocks:

Description Chris Pelland 2013-01-24 13:42:56 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #889341 +++

Description of problem:

RHEL-5.9 releases in early January.  This bug is intended to track updating the AMI's for RHEL-5.9 to imagefactory to support deploying EC2 RHEL-5.9 applications

Versions affected:
 * imagefactory-jeosconf-ec2-rhel-1.0.2-1.el6cf.noarch

--- Additional comment from Ian McLeod on 2013-01-23 15:06:52 EST ---

This has been brewed as:

imagefactory-jeosconf-ec2-rhel-1.0.2_3_gadcc5de-1

Comment 3 Dave Johnson 2013-02-19 15:19:10 UTC

good 2 go with

[root@cloud-qe-14 ~]# rpm -qa | grep imagefac
imagefactory-jeosconf-ec2-fedora-1.0.3-1.el6cf.noarch
imagefactory-jeosconf-ec2-rhel-1.0.3-1.el6cf.noarch
imagefactory-1.0.3-1.el6cf.noarch

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 19:08:50 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0545.html