Bug 909495

Summary:	Virt-only subscriptions are not available for export in a manifest
Product:	[Community] Candlepin	Reporter:	Amanda Carter <acarter>
Component:	candlepin	Assignee:	Jesus M. Rodriguez <jesusr>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	0.9	CC:	dcrissman, dgoodwin, ftan, jesusr, rmunilla, tomckay
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-06-14 13:15:57 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	833466

Description Amanda Carter 2013-02-08 22:42:58 UTC

Description of problem:

Virt only pools in IT's prod candlepin are not available for export in a manifest. The subscriptions do not create a physical pool and are available as expected on virt instances. I expect that we're just not handling these pools like we thought we did but don't know if this is an IT bug or Eng -- starting with Eng.

How reproducible:

You can see this by logging into the stage_test_58 / redhat account or the stage_test_whitelist3 account in stage. 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a SAM or CF instance
2. Look for subscription with name 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux for VMware, Premium (up to 2 sockets)' on account stage_test_58
3. It does not appear
4. Create a virt system
5. Look for the same subscription
6. It does appear

* The subscription on the stage_test_whitelist3 account is RHEL as a Virtual Guest, Disaster Recovery

Comment 1 Devan Goodwin 2013-02-11 13:38:44 UTC

Plain virt_only subscriptions do not appear to be blocked for manifest consumer types like sam. Testing locally but it seems ok.

I do notice the pool has "enabled_consumer_types" set to "SAM", the consumer's type is "sam", we do not enforce this attribute but does the portal do anything possibly missing case insensitive comparison?

Comment 7 Jesus M. Rodriguez 2013-02-27 18:16:47 UTC

commit ed09185d82eafe2629f0737480040a603d737369
Refs: master, <origin/HEAD>, <origin/master>, candlepin-0.7.25-1-10-ged09185
Merge: b10000d d9391d7
Author:     Devan Goodwin <dgoodwin>
AuthorDate: Wed Feb 27 09:04:36 2013 -0800
Commit:     Devan Goodwin <dgoodwin>
CommitDate: Wed Feb 27 09:04:36 2013 -0800

    Merge pull request #180 from candlepin/virtonlymaster

    909495: Virt-only subscriptions are not exportable

This will be available from master in candlepin version 0.7.26 or greater.

Comment 8 Fengshuang Tan 2013-04-28 09:26:24 UTC

Verify...
1. Register account stage_test_58 on host system
2. Look for subscription with name 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux for VMware, Premium (up to 2 sockets)' - MCT0994
# subscription-manager list --avail | grep MCT0994
3. cannot find MCT0994

4. Register account stage_test_58 on virt system
5. Look for the same subscription
# subscription-manager list --avail | grep MCT0994
SKU:                  	MCT0994
6. It's successful to find MCT0994 on virt system


After the above verification, the virt-only sku MCT0994 still cannot be listed on host system, so moved to ASSIGNED.

Comment 9 Amanda Carter 2013-04-29 14:32:28 UTC

This subscription *should not* be available oh a host/physical system. It should only be available on a virt system and on a Distributor. I have just spot checked that this has been resolved. 

Please just be sure that your test criteria is correct to only expect these subscriptions on virt systems and not on physical systems. This should be true for any subscription that is 'virt-only' identified by having a value of Virtual Guest in the attributes table.

Comment 10 Fengshuang Tan 2013-05-08 09:31:13 UTC

(In reply to comment #9)
> This subscription *should not* be available oh a host/physical system. It
> should only be available on a virt system and on a Distributor. I have just
> spot checked that this has been resolved. 
> 
> Please just be sure that your test criteria is correct to only expect these
> subscriptions on virt systems and not on physical systems. This should be
> true for any subscription that is 'virt-only' identified by having a value
> of Virtual Guest in the attributes table.

Hi Amanda,

Thanks for your clarification, and, I re-test it against stage candlepin, and the following are my test steps:
1. Log into access.stage.redhat.com with account stage_test_58
2. Click 'Subscription Management Applications' -> Create one organization MCT0994 -> Attach a subscription of MCT0994
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux for VMware, Premium (up to 2 sockets)
3. Export this manifest with 'download manifest' button
- manifest.zip 
4. Prepare one SAM server, and import 'manifest.zip' to SAM server
5. register to the SAM server and check on one virt machine
MCT0994 does appear

Please help me confirm if my verification process is correct, if yes, please move this bug to VERIFIED, if not, please give me some deeper guide, thanks~

Thanks~
Fengshuang

Comment 11 Amanda Carter 2013-05-08 13:45:23 UTC

Looks good to me Fengshuang. In fact this bug previously occurred when just attaching a subscription to a SAM instance so did not require importing the manifest to a SAM, but the scenario you've noted is a full end to end verification of that fix. Thanks!

Comment 12 Fengshuang Tan 2013-05-09 07:36:13 UTC

Thanks for Amanda's patient explanation.

And, according to Comment 10 and Comment 11, this bug has been fixed, so move it to VERIFIED.

Comment 13 Dennis Crissman 2013-06-14 13:15:57 UTC

Closing as no further issues have been reported.

Thanks!