Bug 910537 (palapeli)
| Summary: | Review Request: palapeli - A jigsaw puzzle game | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | nucleo <alekcejk> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | alekcejk, kevin, ltinkl, notting, package-review, than |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | alekcejk:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-02-22 21:46:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 908920 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 656997, 907993 | ||
|
Description
Rex Dieter
2013-02-12 19:32:55 UTC
Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegames/palapeli.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegames/palapeli-4.10.0-3.fc18.src.rpm Description: Palapeli is a single-player jigsaw puzzle game. The Palapeli window is separated into two areas, the puzzle collection and the puzzle table. This manual will now continue with describing these two areas. %changelog * Fri Feb 15 2013 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 4.10.0-3 - update license, description Most of code under GPLv2+ license, documentation under GFDL. Library libpala packaged in palapeli-libs under LGPLv2+ license. Pics license GPLv2+ src/pics/LICENSE can be added in %doc. Also Goldberg slicer plugin description slicers/goldber/README can be added in %doc. Better %description from documentation chapter 4: Palapeli is a single-player jigsaw puzzle game. The object of the game is to assemble the given pieces to an image. Should update-mime-database and update-desktop-database be in %post and %postun? Currently in %postun and %posttrans. where the scriptlets go is largely a matter of taste. I personally have been trying to get fpc to update to allow the update-desktop-* stuff to go in %posttrans too (like icon scriptlets) for optimization purposes (so they can theoretically get run only once per transaction instead of once per pkg). If you insist this is a blocker, I'm open to changing it to strictly conform to the guidelines. Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegames/palapeli.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegames/palapeli-4.10.0-4.fc18.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Feb 22 2013 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 4.10.0-4 - update description - -libs,-devel: License: LGPLv2+ MUST Items:
+ rpmlint output
$ rpmlint palapeli-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm palapeli-libs-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm palapeli-devel-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm palapeli-debuginfo-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm palapeli-4.10.0-4.fc18.src.rpm palapeli.spec
palapeli.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary palapeli
palapeli-libs.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment
palapeli-libs.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment
palapeli-libs.i686: W: no-documentation
palapeli-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
+ named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Package name match the upstream tarball name palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ spec file name palapeli.spec matches base package name
+ complies with all the legal guidelines:
+ License: GPLv2+ and GFDL, LGPLv2+ for palapeli-lib matches actual license
+ No known patent problems
+ No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components
+ COPYING (GPLv2), COPYING.DOC (GFDL) amd COPYING.LIB (LGPLv2+) packaged as %doc
+ source matches upstream:
MD5: 5f8b63dbf65c8303e77af396337ec320 palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
SHA1: da5a7b197e6a641c4882d15e85923303e2646567 palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
SHA256: abcb14d992a864b696bc652171069eecd469922fd724e30c5821c77ae41ae00e palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ builds on at least one arch
build from mock is in F18 kde-unstable repo
+ no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed
+ no missing BuildRequires (builds in mock)
+ locales are handled properly by using %find_lang %{name} --with-kde macro
+ ldconfig call used in palapeli-libs %post and %postun
+ no duplicated system libraries
+ package not relocatable (no Prefix tag)
+ directory ownership correct (doesn't own directories owned by another package, owns all package-specific directories %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/, %{_kde4_includedir}/libpala/, %{_kde4_libdir}/libpala/, %{_kde4_includedir}/Pala/)
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ permissions correct, %defattr(-,root,root,-) not needed now, executables have executable permissions
+ macros used where possible (%{name}, %{version}, %{buildroot}, %{_target_platform}, %{cmake_kde4}, %{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir}, %{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir}, %{_kde4_libdir}, %{_kde4_includedir})
+ non-code content: only permitted content, images under license that matches the code
+ no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed
+ no %doc files required at runtime
+ header files packaged in palapeli-devel
+ no static libraries, so no -static package needed
+ devel symlink packaged in palapeli-devel
+ palapeli-devel package must require the base package palapeli-libs
+ no .la files
+ palapeli.desktop file for the GUI app palapeli present
+ desktop-file-validate is used in %check and the palapeli.desktop file passes validation
+ all filenames are valid UTF-8
+ other packaging guidelines:
+ complies with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (all files in %{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir}, %{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir}, %{_kde4_libdir}, %{_kde4_includedir})
+ proper changelog, tags, BuildRequires, Summary, Description (got from palapeli's documentation)
+ no non-UTF-8 characters
+ all relevant documentation included as %doc (COPYING, COPYING.DOC, COPYING.LIB)
+ RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used in %{cmake_kde4} macro
+ palapeli-debuginfo package is valid (contains stripped symbols from ELF binary and source code related to it)
+ no rpaths (no check-rpaths error)
+ no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply
+ no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply
+ timestamps are preserved
+ %{?_smp_mflags} used
+ not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply
+ no conflicts (kdegames-4.10.0 is metapackage now which not includes apps)
SHOULD Items:
+ license already included upstream
+ no translations for description and summary provided by upstream
+ package builds in mock (built for kde-unstable)
- successfully tested the package functionality (no testing yet)
+ scriptlets are sane (updating hicolor icon chache in %post, %postun, %posttrans, updating mime and desktop database)
+ subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency (palapeli-libs can be installed without palapeli)
+ no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant
+ no file dependencies
- package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts
APPROVED
For fixing W: no-documentation COPYING.LIB can be moved to -libs %doc. COPYING and COPYING.DOC in main package %doc, COPYING.LIB in -libs %doc. Thanks, will do. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: palepeli Short Description: A jigsaw puzzle game Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: Requested package name palepeli doesn't match bug summary palapeli, please correct. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: palapeli Short Description: A jigsaw puzzle game Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). imported Sorry for typo, right path for README slicers/goldberg/README |