Bug 911914
| Summary: | Separate thread is used for fsync() calls on small files | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Peter Portante <pportant> |
| Component: | object-storage | Assignee: | Thiago da Silva <thiago> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | bugs, gluster-bugs, miteshpathak05, pportant |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-12-14 19:40:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Peter Portante
2013-02-16 17:38:45 UTC
I would like to work on it! Work is already done, just needs to be submitted to gluster upstream. Hi Peter, Can you please update the bug if the work is submitted to master along with the review request / patch number ? Thanks, Chetan Risbud. We'd have to wade through the old PDQ branch in order to find this code. Sorry, that was a long time ago. It is not clear to me that on GlusterFS the DiskFile backend needs to issue an fsync in order to ensure the data is persisted, because Gluster already does that. The version that this bug has been reported against, does not get any updates from the Gluster Community anymore. Please verify if this report is still valid against a current (3.4, 3.5 or 3.6) release and update the version, or close this bug. If there has been no update before 9 December 2014, this bug will get automatocally closed. |