Bug 91474

Summary: jed package cripple
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide Reporter: acount closed by user <a1459440>
Component: jedAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Jay Turner <jturner>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0CC: rvokal, srevivo
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 18:53:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description acount closed by user 2003-05-22 22:07:08 UTC
Description of problem:

no xjed and no rgrep , where is the problem?
and there is a newer version 0.99.16 with a lot of bugs fixed


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2003-05-22 22:54:13 UTC
rgrep is obsoleted by jed -r.

xjed, see 77928.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 82218 ***

Comment 2 acount closed by user 2003-05-22 23:29:12 UTC
jed -r ? sure ? 

rgrep is like grep

xjed is a very light code editor, with little dependencies and fast with X-free
through the net

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2003-05-23 01:38:48 UTC
grep -r, actually. Typo.

xjed suffers some of the same problems as jed (lack of unicode support), and,
as opposed to a console editor, doesn't offer many benefits (such as integration
with the various desktop environments.)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 82218 ***

Comment 4 acount closed by user 2003-05-23 01:54:17 UTC
yes, not today but soon

"As many of you know, the next slang release will provide full
support for unicode using the UTF-8 encoding..."

are going rh to delete all packages without gnome/kde integration ?


Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-05-23 02:06:33 UTC
No, although those GUI apps that integrate into the desktop will be preferred.
For non-terminal editors there are the various notepads, gvim, emacs, and xemacs
already included, not to mention jed/joe/vi/etc. in a terminal.

Comment 6 acount closed by user 2003-05-24 13:45:55 UTC
vi(gvim) and emacs(xemacs) are classical editors , on the other hand jed(xjed)
is a mix of both. Light and fast with emacs emulation. I hope with new
slang2(utf8) you rethink to put xjed again


Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 18:53:13 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.