Bug 916634
Summary: | engine [TEXT]: parameters does not seem like the correct word for updating vm alert in even tog | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Dafna Ron <dron> |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Martin Betak <mbetak> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Lukas Svaty <lsvaty> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.2.0 | CC: | acathrow, iheim, jkt, lpeer, michal.skrivanek, ofrenkel, pstehlik, Rhev-m-bugs, yeylon |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.3.0 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | virt | ||
Fixed In Version: | is6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dafna Ron
2013-02-28 14:43:48 UTC
This format of message "<item> parameters were updated" is also used for Hosts, VM pools, VM templates and Tags. Should these also be changed to 'configuration'? (In reply to comment #1) > This format of message "<item> parameters were updated" is also used for > Hosts, VM pools, VM templates and Tags. Should these also be changed to > 'configuration'? good catch :) my two cents are that we should change it for all, but I think its a PM decision on weather to do that or not. Andy, do we want to change it everywhere? Do we want to change it at all? Please confirm Closing - RHEV 3.3 Released Closing - RHEV 3.3 Released Closing - RHEV 3.3 Released |