Bug 91680

Summary: (NET TULIP) kernel-2.4.20-13.7 breaks networking with weird PCI errors
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component: kernelAssignee: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.3CC: peterm, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i586   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-06-29 02:09:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
lspci -v output none

Description Bill Nottingham 2003-05-27 05:15:49 UTC
P100, 128MB. lspci (gathered under 2.4.18-27.7.x) is attached.

Using de4x5 for eth0 for the 21040, and tulip for the Lite-On.
tulip has carrier detection issues on this 21040 since 2.4.9-ish, if
not earlier.

Also has pcmcia that fails due to the missing directory, but I'm sure that's
elsewhere in bugzilla.


May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel: eth0: DE434/5 at 0xf880 (PCI bus 0, device 8),
h/w address 08:00:2b:e6:d2:ca,
May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel:       and requires IRQ10 (provided by PCI BIOS).
May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel: de4x5.c:V0.546 2001/02/22 davies.com
May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel: eth0: media is TP.
May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel: Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.15-pre12 (Aug 9, 2002)
May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel: PCI: Unable to reserve I/O region #1:80@f880 for
device 00:08.0
May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel: PCI: Unable to reserve I/O region #1:80@f880 for
device 00:08.0
May 26 00:27:34 sulaco kernel: tulip1:  MII transceiver #1 config 3000 status
7809 advertising 01e1.
May 26 00:27:35 sulaco kernel: eth1: Lite-On 82c168 PNIC rev 32 at 0xc883c400,
00:A0:CC:57:D8:07, IRQ 15.

Basically, the driver initializes, but the card doesn't pass data. I'm presuming
it's because of the PCI errors, but it could be a generic driver bug.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2003-05-27 05:16:08 UTC
Created attachment 91982 [details]
lspci -v output

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2003-05-27 05:18:38 UTC
Oddly, the PCI errors appear to be in regards to the de4x5 driver, but it's the
tulip driver that doesn't work.

Comment 3 Jeff Garzik 2004-06-14 17:13:33 UTC
Are de4x5 and tulip both getting loaded?


Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2004-06-29 02:09:32 UTC
Appears to be working in FC1.