Bug 917949
| Summary: | Improve support for process versioning | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] JBoss BPMS Platform 6 | Reporter: | Martin Weiler <mweiler> |
| Component: | jBPM Designer | Assignee: | Kris Verlaenen <kverlaen> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Kirill Gaevskii <kgaevski> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Dawn Eisner <deisner> |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.0.0 | CC: | kverlaen, paradhya, rrajasek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Cause: In BRMS 5, the process id had to be manually changed to create a new version of a process to validate the version attribute.
Consequence: When a process is created, the version id of that process is not validated and needs to be automated.
Fix: With the new Mavenized build and deploy approach, the support for versioning has improved significantly.
Result: Process versioning is now automatically validated every time a process is updated or created.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-03-27 20:13:31 UTC | Type: | Feature Request |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Martin Weiler
2013-03-05 07:39:07 UTC
With the new mavenized build and deploy approach, the support for versioning has improved significantly. As a result, it would need to be verified that the current implementation does indeed solve the requested issues. Engineering believes the recent improvements in this area do solve the limitations mentioned in the linked JIRA. Since there has been no comments, marking this as devel_ack-. Kris Verlaenen <kris.verlaenen> updated the status of jira JBPM-3758 to Resolved Hi Marek, Doc Text has been added. Can you please review the CCFR. |