Bug 918696
Summary: | Multiple threads simultaneously working on connection's private buffer causes ns-slapd to abort | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Nathan Kinder <nkinder> |
Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | Rich Megginson <rmeggins> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Sankar Ramalingam <sramling> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | jgalipea, mkubik, nhosoi |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-base-1.3.1.2-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-13 10:50:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nathan Kinder
2013-03-06 18:14:16 UTC
moving all ON_QA bugs to MODIFIED in order to add them to the errata (can't add bugs in the ON_QA state to an errata). When the errata is created, the bugs should be automatically moved back to ON_QA. Is this sanity only verification? Rich provided a reproducer on Ticket 276 (https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/276). Attachment nounbind.c added reproducer - c code Attachment examples.h added reproducer - header Attachment Makefile added reproducer - Makefile Compile nounbind.c and simultaneously run 100 of them in the endless loop for one hour. After running the program for one hour in a loop the server was still running. No errors found. Though I didn't manage to run 100 of them at the same time. There were around 10 processes running at the same time. Is it ok to verify this under these circumstances? (In reply to Milan Kubík from comment #5) > After running the program for one hour in a loop the server was still > running. No errors found. Though I didn't manage to run 100 of them at the > same time. There were around 10 processes running at the same time. > > Is it ok to verify this under these circumstances? I think that's good enough. Thank you, Milan. Please mark VERIFIED. This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0. Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request. |