Bug 91939

Summary: Open Source 101 needs updating
Product: Red Hat Web Site Reporter: Darren Brierton <darren>
Component: OtherAssignee: Jeremy Hogan <jhogan>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: current   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.redhat.com/opensourcenow/open_source_101.html
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-05-11 03:30:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Darren Brierton 2003-05-30 03:37:28 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030509

Description of problem:
The Open Source 101 web page needs updating/improving. In particular:

  1. *Please* update the screenshots. Current (RHL9) versions look so much
better than what you have on show!

  2. You need to explain the nature of the various open source licenses a little
better: people are often confused by it.

We need a good short introduction to what this stuff is about, because *so* many
people don't get it. This page could be it, but currently isn't.

An example: a friend of mine is a very senior curator at probably the most
prestigious copyright library in Britain, if not the world. He is interested in
open-source, because he is involved in a consortium of libraries across Europe
attempting to implement open standards for information exchange. But he doesn't
really understand open-source; are we against commerce, are we against
intellectual property rights, are we just some weird bunch of hippies trying to
do away with private property? Now I think I have succesfully clarified the
issues to *him*, but there are lots of people like him who don't get it. People
who are influential. You need to have a nice simple page that clarifies not only
the benefits of open-source from a software development POV, but also from an
end-user POV, and which explain simply what the kind of licenses permit and
don't permit and why that is a good thing.

People understand the idea of a better development model; they also understand
the idea of a services vs. a manufacturing model. But the "openness" and the
"free" stuff still confuses them, and this page ought to set those confusions
straight. I would very much like to have somewhere to point my own clients in
explaining this. Your page should be it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Go to the URL and be disappointed by what's on offer.

Comment 1 Jeremy Hogan 2004-05-11 15:16:22 UTC
We are looking at the whole OpenSource:NOW: site for an update and
functionality overhaul. Please let me know if there's other areas you
have ideas about.