Bug 92338
Summary: | (IRQ_ROUTING)kernel upgrades break USB | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Mimo Zus <mimozus> | ||||
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 9 | CC: | grash, oscar.valdez | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-09-30 15:41:03 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Mimo Zus
2003-06-05 09:57:37 UTC
Created attachment 92157 [details]
normal and error log entries
messages is 3000+lines long. Didn't want to send the whole thing. Please
advise
if you require more.
*** Bug 92339 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Very likely a dup of bug of 91041. I have the same problem as Mimo Zus above with the exact same mobo (Abit VP6 mobo, dual PIII 733mhz) running kernel 2.4.20-20.9smp. Somewhere along the upgrade path from RH8 (2.4.20-ish kernel) to FC1 (2.4.22-1.2174.nptl), the following message began to appear on PC's connected to UPS's of a specific make and model: usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=2 (error=-110) The systems are unable to load the UPS monitoring daemon (apcupsd). The UPS's are APC, model Back-UPS ES 500, and their USB vendor and product ID are the following: Vendor=051d ProdID=0002. I have other FC1 systems hooked up to other models from APC, and they work flawlessly, as do other RH8 systems hooked up to Back-UPSs ES 500. The problem is specific to the combination of FC1 and the ES 500. The underlying problem might be the same as in bugs 91041, 92417, 110269, 110492, and 110496 (same error message). Upgraded to kernel 2.4.22-1.2179.nptl. Problem persists. Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem persists. The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/ |