Bug 923669
Summary: | Review Request: tex-prerex-bin - Interactive editor for prerequisite charts | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jindrich Novy <jnovy> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jnovy, orion, package-review, rdtennent, tomspur |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-11-20 11:25:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 923671 |
Description
Jindrich Novy
2013-03-20 10:04:31 UTC
The link to the source seems to have changed. This seems to work with the new version: http://mirrors.ctan.org/graphics/prerex/doc/prerex-%version.tar.gz The buildroot seems odd. Do you still need it? IIRC, we had a different set of allowed buildroot tags such as %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release} and not _topdir. Not sure we need this package any longer. "any longer"? After six years of doing nothing, you're asking whether "we" need this package? Who exactly is "we"? The prerex editor is used with the prerex package that's distributed at CTAN. It's included in the prerex package in TeXLive but only as a tarball because it uses readline and they're not willing to include that library in TeXLive. Apart from that, the prerex editor is a straightforward C program. It's still maintained. I recently extended its capabilities as a result of a user report. Don't have time getting involved in this, sorry. Please submit a new review request if you believe it makes sense. |