Bug 924031
| Summary: | initial-setup-graphical.service fails | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
| Component: | initial-setup | Assignee: | Martin Sivák <msivak> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 19 | CC: | bcl, msivak, robatino, vpodzime |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedBlocker | ||
| Fixed In Version: | initial-setup-0.3.1-1.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-04-04 21:05:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 834084 | ||
|
Description
Adam Williamson
2013-03-21 01:06:08 UTC
*** Bug 924032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Proposing as Alpha blocker - if this is confirmed in a straightforward KDE image case, it would violate "A system installed with a graphical package set must boot to the 'firstboot' utility on the first boot after installation. The firstboot utility must be able to create a working user account." What is the version of installed anaconda package? Ah, now I see it, it needs newer anaconda. It should be fixed when anaconda-19.13 gets built. clearing needinfo, then. I fixed one more bug related to the anaconda changes that caused this failure and updated the spec file dependencies. Discussed at 2013-03-27 blocker review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-03-27/f19alpha-blocker-review-3.2013-03-27-16.01.log.txt . Accepted as a blocker per criterion cited in comment #2. Note that bcl was not a fan of the idea of initial-setup having a package dependency on anaconda, which seems to have been the 'fix' for this: we might want to change that. As of 0.3.4-1.fc19, the fix for this is still: Requires: anaconda >= 19.13 bcl, are you happy with that as a fix? If so, we should close this. If not, we need to fix the fix. The problem with requiring anaconda at run-time is it'll mean any graphical install will pull in all of anaconda's package deps; it's kind of messy and unnecessary. I'd suggest we can actually just live without an explicit 'fix' for this; we can just assume any image with initial-setup in it will be built with a new-enough anaconda, the dep really isn't necessary. The dependency is necessary. Initial-setup uses a lot of anaconda code. dlehman worked on splitting the package into two smaller ones though. ah, I see. in that case, yeah, it'd be good to split it up so we don't have to drag the whole of anaconda into installed systems. this is fixed, per above: improving things so we don't need the anaconda dep would be a different bug. |